Link to poem: https://poets.org/poem/somewhere-i-have-never-travelledgladly-beyond
somewhere i have never travelled, gladly beyond, by E.E. Cummings is a modernist poem about deep emotional connection and love. The love that is clearly in the present can be interpreted in two different ways. The love can be seen as romantic or it can be seen as a familial/parental love that two family members feel for each other. I tend to favor the first option. This is for a few reasons but the most obvious to me is the continuing symbol of flowers and roses. Roses are a common symbol for romance and love and there are multiple references to these symbols throughout the 5 stanza poem. For example the line “as when the heart of this flower imagines” and “you always open petal by petal myself as Spring opens” both reference flowers. If this poem were to be for a family member I feel that this symbol would not have been so prevalent. Additionally, I do not feel like a family member would tell their parent or fellow family member that “the voice of your eyes is deeper than all roses”. Not only is the symbol of roses apparent in this line but is also a very romantic and passionate statement. Additionally, the line contains personification and metaphor. The speaker personifies the eyes of his lover as having a voice and then goes on to state that the voice is deeper than roses. Moving onto the title, it is quite odd. It contains no capitalized letters and it is somewhat lengthy. For the meaning of the title itself I feel that the place the speaker has “never traveled” is love and having such a deep connection with a person. The “gladly beyond” at the end shows that the speaker may be in love with this person but wants to go beyond their current relationship and take the next step, whatever that may be. The lack of capitalization in the title shows that the current relationship that the speaker has with the person they love may be casual and more of a friendship. The lack of capitalization hints at a lack of formality of the relationship showing that this poem may be a confession of love poem. This poem relies completely on enjambed lines. There is not a single end stop. I feel this is because the poem is the speaker almost pouring out all of his feelings to the person he loves and since he has been holding it back so long he doesn’t stop he just continues to pour out his feelings. The close it gets to an end-stop are semi-colons but even then the thoughts connected by semi-colons flow together very well. Because of that, I see those as more of caesuras meant to be paused on but soon continuing on. I have already touched on the speaker a bit but I feel that they are a very passionate and loving person who is deeply in love with a friend or acquaintance of theirs. The structure of the poem is very simple. 5 stanzas written in free verse. There is no unique format that the poem follows which again reinforces the idea that the poem is not supposed to be incredibly flashy it’s supposed to be an informal declaration of love. Something that is interesting to me is that the last stanza is in brackets and that is the only stanza to do that. I feel that is because it is the first time that the speaker expresses uncertainty. The whole poem they are discussing how the person makes them feel but the beginning of this stanza puts all of it into question-begging why that is: “(i do not know what it is about you that closes and opens;”